Theory of the sea ice thickness distribution. Ising model for melt ponds on Arctic sea ice. The percolation phase transition in sea ice. Trade liberalization and 'revealed' comparative advantage. Characterizing scientific production and consumption in physics. Zhang, Q., Perra, N., Goncalves, B., Ciulla, F. Physicists attempt to scale the ivory towers of finance. Coverage of highly-cited documents in google scholar, web of science, and scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. ![]() A Nobel Opportunity for Interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinary research by the numbers. The first-mover advantage in scientific publication. Rescaling citations of publications in physics. The discipline dependence of citation statistics. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., Rijcke, S. A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Hot streaks in artistic, cultural, and scientific careers. Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Sinatra, R., Wang, D., Deville, P., Song, C. The scientific prize network predicts who pushes the boundaries of science. Patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. Identification of successful mentoring communities using network-based analysis of mentor–mentee relationships across nobel laureates. The role of mentorship in protégé performance. Faculty productivity in supervising doctoral students? dissertations at cornell university. Whose mass is it anyway? particle cosmology and the objects of theory. Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution. (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 2018).ĪTLAS. Solid State Insurrection: How the Science of Substance made American Physics Matter. Booms, busts, and the world of ideas: Enrollment pressures and the challenge of specialization. (Columbia University Press, New York, 1993). The research space: using career paths to predict the evolution of the research output of individuals, institutions, and nations. R., Hartmann, D., Aristarán, M., Mendoza, M. The evolution of interdisciplinarity in physics research. Mapping the evolution of scientific fields. Community structure of the physical review citation network. Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Catholique Louvain (2015).ĪIP Publishing. Understanding social dynamics through big data. Sinatra, R., Deville, P., Szell, M., Wang, D. Career on the move: geography, stratification, and scientific impact. Data-driven predictions in the science of science. The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. ![]() This detailed, longitudinal census of physics can inform resource allocation policies and provide students, editors and scientists with a broader view of the field’s internal dynamics. Furthermore, we analyse the productivity, impact and team sizes across different subfields, finding drastic changes attributable to the recent rise in large-scale collaborations. We find that the majority of physicists began their careers in only three subfields, branching out to other areas at later career stages, with different rates and transition times. We use a large-scale publication data set, identify the subfields of 135,877 physicists and quantify their heterogeneous birth, growth and migration patterns among research areas. To map out the evolution of physics subfields, here, we take an intellectual census of physics by studying physicists’ careers. However, it is unclear how these new subfields emerged from the traditional subject areas and how physicists explore them. Over the past decades, the diversity of areas explored by physicists has exploded, encompassing new topics from biophysics and chemical physics to network science.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |